08 May 2012

My Response To A Very Bad Threat.

To the Wormsley's (Don and Robin) from St. Joseph, Missouri (originally from Cosby, MO), this is in response to Don's veiled threat: "Message to Sarah Spiers who lives at Maysville , Mo and attends MWSU , Are you familiar with the Cyberbullying law that was passed inot law when Matt Blunt was govenor ? Kepp it up and you will become very familiar with it. So if you know her pass this bit of info to her."

- Since you made yours public, I'll be an asshole and make this public, I'm sure it should get back to you.

*************************
Also, since I'm an asshole: lives *in Maysville, MO. There's no space between MWSU and the comma. Actually that comma should be a colon. *into* *governor* No space between "govenor" [sic] and the ? *Keep*
*************************

- Oh you mean RSMO 565.225 and RSMO 565.090? Yeah, one can say I'm familiar with them. I'm even looking at the statutes right now!

Crime of stalking--definitions--penalties.

565.225. 1. As used in this section, the following terms shall mean:

(1) "Course of conduct", a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts, which may include communication by any means, over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of course of conduct. Such constitutionally protected activity includes picketing or other organized protests;

(2) "Credible threat", a threat communicated with the intent to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her family, or household members or domestic animals or livestock as defined in section 276.606 kept at such person's residence or on such person's property. The threat must be against the life of, or a threat to cause physical injury to, or the kidnapping of, the person, the person's family, or the person's household members or domestic animals or livestock as defined in section 276.606 kept at such person's residence or on such person's property;

(3) "Harasses", to engage in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that serves no legitimate purpose, that would cause a reasonable person under the circumstances to be frightened, intimidated, or emotionally distressed.

*******************
Key word: "Reasonable Person". Robin is far from reasonable, especially in the state of mind she's been in for the last several months.
*******************

2. A person commits the crime of stalking if he or she purposely, through his or her course of conduct, harasses or follows with the intent of harassing another person.

*****************
I have not harassed or followed Robin, ever. Unless you consider me telling her she needs serious psychological help because she spazzes out over stupid shit, then won't let it go, then takes it out on everyone else, accuses everyone of some perceived wrongdoing to her in her egocentric world, then has whatever friends he has left convey messages to people that have essentially told her to go fuck off (or vice versa) after she's been told to cease and desist, then and maybe then I've harassed her
*********** Side note: I doubt posting 2 or 3 pictures to facebook referring to deleting/blocking someone from your facebook then using a friends account to spy on said blocked person is considered harassment, and quite frankly, it's the truth. Robin has gone as far as making dummy accounts, adding the friends she deleted and blocked just to see if we were talking about her and what we were saying.
*********** Another side note: Bitch is crazy and needs psychological help. And you, Don, are doing nothing but enabling her and allowing her to continue on the path of self destruction.
****************

3. A person commits the crime of aggravated stalking if he or she purposely, through his or her course of conduct, harasses or follows with the intent of harassing another person, and:

(1) Makes a credible threat; or

(2) At least one of the acts constituting the course of conduct is in violation of an order of protection and the person has received actual notice of such order; or

(3) At least one of the actions constituting the course of conduct is in violation of a condition of probation, parole, pretrial release, or release on bond pending appeal; or

(4) At any time during the course of conduct, the other person is seventeen years of age or younger and the person harassing the other person is twenty-one years of age or older; or

(5) He or she has previously pleaded guilty to or been found guilty of domestic assault, violation of an order of protection, or any other crime where the other person was the victim.

*****************
I've never made a credible threat against Robin, I've never threatened her wellbeing or that of her loved ones/pets/livestock. I've never had an order of protection against me, especially not from Robin (whom I avoid as much as possible). I'm not "walking paper" so 3 does not apply to me either.

Robin is 54 fucking years old and although she has the mentality and emotional age of a 5 year old #4 does not relate. #5 does not apply since I have not pleaded guilty or been found guilty of anything.
*****************

Numbers 4-7 refer to classing of the crime and therefore is not relevant to this argument.

Harassment.

565.090. 1. A person commits the crime of harassment if he or she:

(1) Knowingly communicates a threat to commit any felony to another person and in so doing frightens, intimidates, or causes emotional distress to such other person; or

*******************
I have never once threatened yourself or Robin. Again, I have indeed told her (on several occasions) that she needs serious psychological help. I don't think of that as a threat. The only thing that may get me here is "causes emotional distress" which is impossible not to do with Robin, who takes everything as a threat or some semblance of bullying and puts HERSELF into emotional distress.
*******************

(2) When communicating with another person, knowingly uses coarse language offensive to one of average sensibility and thereby puts such person in reasonable apprehension of offensive physical contact or harm; or

*******************
She cannot be offended by my language if she uses it herself. Again, I have never used course language to threaten her, her loved ones, pets or livestock.
*******************

(3) Knowingly frightens, intimidates, or causes emotional distress to another person by anonymously making a telephone call or any electronic communication; or

*******************
I never intentionally frightened, intimidated or caused Robin emotional distress, and I certainly did not do it anonymously if I inadvertently did.
*******************

(4) Knowingly communicates with another person who is, or who purports to be, seventeen years of age or younger and in so doing and without good cause recklessly frightens, intimidates, or causes emotional distress to such other person; or

*******************
Just because Robin has the emotional age of a selfish 5 year old does not mean she falls into this category.
*******************

(5) Knowingly makes repeated unwanted communication to another person; or

*******************
Nope. I haven't done this either.
*******************

(6) Without good cause engages in any other act with the purpose to frighten, intimidate, or cause emotional distress to another person, cause such person to be frightened, intimidated, or emotionally distressed, and such person's response to the act is one of a person of average sensibilities considering the age of such person.

*******************
The only thing that may get me here is the fact that I posted 2 or 3 pictures referring to deleting/blocking someone from your facebook then using a friends account to spy on said blocked person. I did not do so to cause Robin to be emotionally distressed, however she is ALWAYS emotionally distressed and it is impossible to not do something to further this state of being.

Furthermore, I would like to draw your attention to the 2nd part of the sentence: and such person's response to the act is one of a person of average sensibilities considering the age of such person. - Robin is far from a person of average sensibilities considering her age. She is always looking for some perceived threat or act of "bullying" and when she finds whatever it is she's looking for she goes off of the deep end. I cannot control her reactions to anything, and really if I bothered her that much she wouldn't listen to a fucking thing Ruth has to say, or look over Ruth's shoulder while looking at my profile.
******************

Point 2 refers to classing of the crime and is therefore not relevant to this argument.

TLDR: Shut the fuck up, Don. If you are going to threaten me then at least have read the laws that you are trying to get me caught up on. Also, if you are going to threaten me, do so with some semblance of literacy and I "may" take it seriously, though I doubt that because you are ALWAYS threatening to sue somebody for some reason. Furthermore, your wife is fucked up in the head. Seriously.